Discuz! Board

 找回密碼
 立即註冊
搜索
熱搜: 活動 交友 discuz
查看: 5|回復: 0

Harming the person entitled

[複製鏈接]

1

主題

1

帖子

5

積分

新手上路

Rank: 1

積分
5
發表於 2023-10-11 17:49:07 | 顯示全部樓層 |閱讀模式
Is not entitled to any claim that could lead to the exercise of the right of pre-emption on his/her initiative. The subject of the right of pre-emption may be both movable items, marked at least by type, and real estate. the right of pre-emption is not limited by any deadline within The obligation to respect this right rests with the seller of the goods. The right of pre-emption is a legal right. This means that the thing to which it relates may be sold to a third party only on the condition that the person entitled to pre-emption does not exercise his right Article § XFrom that moment on, the third party with whom the real estate sale agreement was concluded on condition is released.

From the obligation arising from this agreement, even if it later turns out that the declaration of the entitled person was ineffective. When cannot the right of pre-emption be exercised Pursuant to the provisions phone number list of Art. § of the Civil Code If the obligor under the right of pre-emption sold the item to a third party unconditionally or if he did not notify the entitled person about the sale or provided him with important provisions of the sales contract contrary to reality, he shall be liable for the resulting damage.



In the above regulation, the legislator listed situations that amount to preventing the entitled person from exercising the right of pre-emption , i.e.: conclusion of an unconditional sales contract by the obligor with a third party; failure to notify the entitled person about the sale; notice of sale, which provided information about important provisions of the contract that was inconsistent with reality. The occurrence of any of the circumstances described above gives rise to a claim for compensation on the part of the entitled party on general principles. There is a well-established view in the literature that it cannot be ruled out that in some situations a claim for compensation may be directed not only against the obligor, but also against a third party acquiring the subject of the right of pre-emption, if such a person acted with the intention of to pre-emption.


回復

使用道具 舉報

您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即註冊

本版積分規則

Archiver|手機版|自動贊助|GameHost抗攻擊論壇

GMT+8, 2025-3-17 21:37 , Processed in 0.032161 second(s), 18 queries .

抗攻擊 by GameHost X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
一粒米 | 中興米 | 論壇美工 | 設計 抗ddos | 天堂私服 | ddos | ddos | 防ddos | 防禦ddos | 防ddos主機 | 天堂美工 | 設計 防ddos主機 | 抗ddos主機 | 抗ddos | 抗ddos主機 | 抗攻擊論壇 | 天堂自動贊助 | 免費論壇 | 天堂私服 | 天堂123 | 台南清潔 | 天堂 | 天堂私服 | 免費論壇申請 | 抗ddos | 虛擬主機 | 實體主機 | vps | 網域註冊 | 抗攻擊遊戲主機 | ddos |